Expressions of Relationships: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(ongoing edits) |
(ongoing edits) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* priest / shaman / rabbi / ... | * priest / shaman / rabbi / ... | ||
* advocate | * advocate | ||
* alumni | |||
* nemesis | |||
* cohorts | |||
==Expressions of Relationships== | ==Expressions of Relationships== | ||
Line 54: | Line 57: | ||
== Some interesting questions == | == Some interesting questions / thoughts == | ||
* Are we presuming that relationships are bidirectional? (e.g. crush) No ... | * Are we presuming that relationships are bidirectional? (e.g. crush) No ... | ||
* Relationships are not boolean -- there is a degree, e.g. very close vs. "have heard of some guy.." |
Revision as of 17:53, 25 January 2007
These are my rough notes of what is being written on the flip chart during the VRM meeting breakout on 2006-01-25.
Types of Relationships
- marriage
- business partnership
- counselor
- subscription
- friendship
- family
- contract
- employment
- confucian
- mentor / advisor
- citizenship
- familiar stranger
- customer
- vendor
- circle of trust
- sponsor
- priest / shaman / rabbi / ...
- advocate
- alumni
- nemesis
- cohorts
Expressions of Relationships
You know it is a relationship when ...
- there are implications for the future
- expectations
- recognition
- subscription
- payment
- tipping
- genealogy
- hate sites
- strong feelings
- recommend
- contract
- employment
- ask advice
- expose yourself to vulnerability ("trust")
- blacklist
- conversation
- stalking
- repeat patronage
- badmouth
- reliance
- federation
- referral/introduction
- sponsor
- invite
- rebuff
- evaluate
- bug / PDA
- advocate
- commenting (e.g. blogs)
Some interesting questions / thoughts
- Are we presuming that relationships are bidirectional? (e.g. crush) No ...
- Relationships are not boolean -- there is a degree, e.g. very close vs. "have heard of some guy.."