Expressions of Relationships: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Dimensions) |
|||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Relationships vs. Expressions== | ==Relationships vs. Expressions== | ||
* [ | * [http://socialcustomer.typepad.com/vrm_expression_matrix.pdf Relationships v. Expressions (PDF)] | ||
==Types of Relationships== | ==Types of Relationships== | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
* cohorts | * cohorts | ||
* shared experience | * shared experience | ||
* enemy | |||
==Expressions of Relationships== | ==Expressions of Relationships== | ||
| Line 51: | Line 52: | ||
* contract | * contract | ||
* employment | * employment | ||
* | * <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.180mma.com/ <span style="color:#000000;font-weight:normal; text-decoration:none!important; background:none!important; text-decoration:none;">mma training</span>] | ||
* expose yourself to vulnerability ("trust") | * expose yourself to vulnerability ("trust") | ||
* blacklist | * blacklist | ||
| Line 61: | Line 62: | ||
* federation | * federation | ||
* referral/introduction | * referral/introduction | ||
* <span class="plainlinks">[http://katyperryfirework.net/ <span style="color:#000000;font-weight:normal; text-decoration:none!important; background:none!important; text-decoration:none;">katy perry firework</span>] | |||
* sponsor | * sponsor | ||
* invite | * invite | ||
| Line 89: | Line 91: | ||
* Potential to real | * Potential to real | ||
* Latent to explicit | * Latent to explicit | ||
* <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.americanwoodvents.com/ <span style="color:#000000;font-weight:normal; text-decoration:none!important; background:none!important; text-decoration:none;">Air Return</span>] | |||
* Reciprocity | * Reciprocity | ||
* Symmetry | * Symmetry | ||
| Line 99: | Line 102: | ||
* Law/lawyers as a source of a relationship taxonomy | * Law/lawyers as a source of a relationship taxonomy | ||
* Confucianism as a source of relationship taxonomy | * Confucianism as a source of relationship taxonomy | ||
* A social network that doesn't allow you to include your enemies isn't worth having. | |||
Latest revision as of 10:30, 27 August 2011
These are my rough notes of what is being written on the flip chart during the VRM meeting breakout on 2006-01-25.
Relationships vs. Expressions
Types of Relationships
- marriage
- business partnership
- counselor
- subscription
- friendship
- family
- membership
- fanboy
- contract
- employment
- confucian
- mentor / advisor
- citizenship
- blacklist
- champion
- familiar stranger
- colleague
- teacher
- stalker
- neighbor
- patron
- customer
- vendor
- circle of trust
- sponsor
- priest / shaman / rabbi / ...
- advocate
- alumni
- nemesis
- cohorts
- shared experience
- enemy
Expressions of Relationships
You know it is a relationship when ...
- there are implications for the future
- expectations
- recognition
- subscription
- payment
- tipping
- genealogy
- hate sites
- strong feelings
- recommend
- contract
- employment
- mma training
- expose yourself to vulnerability ("trust")
- blacklist
- conversation
- stalking
- repeat patronage
- badmouth
- reliance
- federation
- referral/introduction
- katy perry firework
- sponsor
- invite
- rebuff
- evaluate
- hug / PDA
- advocate
- commenting (e.g. blogs)
- give gifts
- find
- respond
- keep apprised
- request
- extend credit
- support
- vouch
- shared experience
- having coffee
- conferences
Dimensions
- Time
- Transparency
- Intensity
- Frequency
- Commitment
- Control
- Potential to real
- Latent to explicit
- Air Return
- Reciprocity
- Symmetry
- Frequency of interaction
- Cardinality
Some interesting questions / thoughts
- Are we presuming that relationships are bidirectional? (e.g. crush) No ...
- Relationships are not boolean -- there is a degree, e.g. very close vs. "have heard of some guy.."
- Law/lawyers as a source of a relationship taxonomy
- Confucianism as a source of relationship taxonomy
- A social network that doesn't allow you to include your enemies isn't worth having.