Standards Committee Teleconference 2008 10 22: Difference between revisions
Joe.andrieu (talk | contribs) (New page: ==Standards Committee Teleconference Call Notes== Drafted by Joe Andrieu, October 22, 2008 ==Other Calls== Category:Standards Committee Teleconferences [[:Category:Standards Committee...) |
Joe.andrieu (talk | contribs) (→Notes) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
===R-button states=== | |||
Deep discussion on r-button states. | |||
Do we need more than three? | |||
1. No button - no VRM compliant services are available | |||
2. Open Button - VRM compliant services are available, but no relationship action has been taken | |||
3. Closed Button - VRM compliant services are vavailable, and at least one relationship action has been taken. | |||
===Demo=== | |||
r-button demo from boston face to face was discussed. We reviewed the server-side work Asa has done. Joe has the client side stuff partially working (works as an "onload" function embedded in HTML, drawing on local files for relationship status, and has a XUL firefox plug-in that runs on onload for any page (but doesn't quite yet run the code correctly). | |||
Our goal is to have something for IIW to spur further conversation. | |||
==Action Items== | ==Action Items== | ||
Latest revision as of 16:52, 22 October 2008
Standards Committee Teleconference Call Notes
Drafted by Joe Andrieu, October 22, 2008
Other Calls
Category:Standards Committee Teleconferences
Attendees
- Joe Andrieu
- Asa Hardcastle
Previous Action Items
Agenda
- Set Agenda
- Review previous Action Items
- Review Action Items
Notes
R-button states
Deep discussion on r-button states.
Do we need more than three?
1. No button - no VRM compliant services are available 2. Open Button - VRM compliant services are available, but no relationship action has been taken 3. Closed Button - VRM compliant services are vavailable, and at least one relationship action has been taken.
Demo
r-button demo from boston face to face was discussed. We reviewed the server-side work Asa has done. Joe has the client side stuff partially working (works as an "onload" function embedded in HTML, drawing on local files for relationship status, and has a XUL firefox plug-in that runs on onload for any page (but doesn't quite yet run the code correctly).
Our goal is to have something for IIW to spur further conversation.
Action Items
Next Meeting
November 6?